People complain that the verdict looks more like an out-of-court settlement. But then the issue was a candidate for that in the first place. Only, the parties would never accept the same decision in a discourse, outside. And then they wouldn't look at it an abstract manner. Will they overlook a demolition back in 1992 or another, some 400 years back? Not justice, not fairness, but maybe the best possible solution coming from the apt source. Let's hope our legislators do not undo it by suggestion or provocation.